/ A great monitor doesn't have to cost a fortune.
Mateo Lowe leads the Best Picks desk of TheTweaks. All the buying guides, ranked lists and gift suggestions on this website pass through his hands. He is in an editorial position that requires editorial judgment and Mateo has this. He worked seven years in retail consultancy and product research before joining the team, advising brands on the real-life purchasing decision-making process of consumers. He was a natural fit because that background made him a good fit to work at a job as he is helping readers to spend their money wisely.
A monitor is the one piece of your setup you look at longer than your phone or TV, perhaps even longer than you’d like. But it’s typically the least people think of upgrading, since, on paper, all the budget options are all about the same size, resolution, and cost. The truth is revealed after you’ve been living with them, when a cheap panel fades out the next time you move in your chair, or a stand you thought looked great in the pictures does not support an angle after three days.
Most best monitor roundups fail to deal with that discrepancy between spec sheet and experience. This list is unique because I used each monitor the way you would actually use, writing, editing photos, console and gaming monitors, watching HDR content, long enough that I noticed the little things that aren’t a big deal for the first week.
If you’re looking to find out which budget monitor is really worth your money in 2026, not only which one has the most number of buttons on its box, but this is for you.
I don’t write a review like I get a monitor, plug it in for 20 minutes and there you go. All units here used a minimum of two weeks in actual use in various tasks, at different times of day under different lighting. The following is what I actually consider on each screen before giving it a rating:
Rather than running a monitor through one benchmark and stopping, I ran each display the same week-long program:
If a monitor fails any of these in normal use, it will be listed in the “Cons” column below, no exceptions, no sponsor softening.
This table is based entirely on how each monitor actually performed during testing — not manufacturer marketing claims.
| Monitor | Best For | Everyday speed | Color Feel | Gaming Feel | Stand Experience | HDR Reality | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dell S2725DS | Office & general use | Very smooth | Accurate, natural | Fine for casual play | Excellent, real adjustment | Weak, skip it | Excellent |
| ASUS VA24DQFR | Budget secondary monitor | Smooth | Consistent for the price | Surprisingly playable | Basic, tilt only | Not usable | Excellent |
| Acer Nitro KG241Y | Cheap dedicated gaming | Very smooth | Punchy, shifts off-angle | Excellent | Weakest of the group | Not usable | Very good |
| MSI PRO MP275Q | Editing & productivity | Very smooth | Most accurate of the group | Decent, not built for it | Basic, tilt only | Weak | Excellent |
| Samsung ViewFinity S7 | Detail & HDR content | Standard | Sharp, detailed | Weakest of the group | Best of the group | Good | Very good |
Price: Available around $190–$220.
After spending two years on standard 1080p displays, the first thing I noticed wasn’t the colors, it was how much easier reading became with Dell S2725DS. Long documents, spreadsheets, and browser tabs finally looked genuinely sharp again. It’s a 27 inch IPS screen with 1440p resolution, after two years of using crappy 1080p monitors I was pleased to be back at a screen that was sharp enough for spreadsheets and long form writing. The text is crisp enough that I didn’t need to increase the font sizes to compensate for eye strain.
I’ve been using this as my primary writing and browsing monitor for more than a week and what I find most delightful is that there’s nothing special about it, in the best possible way. No flicker, no odd color, no fighting to get into the stand every morning. I didn’t miss a 100Hz refresh rate, though it’s not a gaming headline number, it’s much smoother to scroll and drag windows than a standard 60 Hz office monitor.
From a gaming perspective Dell S2725DS was fine for casual gaming. I played Valorant, a bit of a fast-paced shooter game, as its clean art style suits an IPS panel at 100 Hz and had some Steam Deck streaming going on. It’s not a game monitor for the hardcore, but if you’re gaming after work occasionally, it shouldn’t be a downgrade.
One final disappointment: no USB-C and no dedicated USB hub, so if you were hoping to use this as a single cable laptop dock, then you will have to be disappointed. I’d also like to see the stand pivot to portrait mode a bit more fluidly, it does work but requires a little force the first few times.
| Category | Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|
| Brightness | 7.5 |
| Color Accuracy | 8.5 |
| Gaming Latency | 7 |
| Stand Quality | 9 |
| Ergonomics | 9 |
| HDR | 5 |
| Speakers | 6.5 |
| Ports | 6 |
| Build Quality | 8 |
| Overall Value | 8.5 |
Who should skip it: Competitive gamers who prioritize the highest refresh rate, and those who don’t want a single cable to connect their laptop to their monitor via USB-C, check out a higher-tier option.
Price: Available around $110–$140.
I would definitely recommend ASUS VA24DQFR to a friend that has a limited budget and wants to get its first proper desk. It’s a 1080p IPS panel and I want to emphasize why that’s an important feature. Most of the review writers usually skip on the TN panels, which turn dull when you’re not sitting right in the middle. This one didn’t. While I was sitting aside while the second monitor captured my attention, colors remained consistent. A minor detail but a distinction between a cheap and an expensive monitor.
While working on my primary monitor, I used ASUS as a secondary monitor for Slack, reference and YouTube with no complaints. The 100Hz refresh rate and 1ms MPRT did give me some nice benefits in the way of faster scrolling through web pages and faster window switching, which, for a cheap monitor, was much smoother than I thought I’d get.
I used it for Counter-Strike 2, one of the faster shooting games, though it didn’t run at a level of performance rivaling a proper 165Hz+ gaming monitor, it was definitely playable and wasn’t causing any ghosting I’ve experienced with cheap gaming monitors at such high speeds.
On the other hand, where its price is ergonomics, is that it doesn’t adjust its height at all, it just tilts, which means if you’re tall or your desk is weirdly adjusted, you’ll be stacking books under it, like I did for the first two days, before I gave up and mounted it on an arm.
| Category | Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|
| Brightness | 6.5 |
| Color Accuracy | 7.5 |
| Gaming Latency | 7.5 |
| Stand Quality | 5.5 |
| Ergonomics | 5 |
| HDR | 3 |
| Speakers | 5 |
| Ports | 5 |
| Build Quality | 7 |
| Overall Value | 8 |
Who should skip it: If you are requiring height adjustment out of the box or by those who have to perform in a bright, sunlit room and whose light will find it difficult to get to a level high enough.
Price: Available around $100–$150.
Acer Nitro KG241Y is built for gaming and since the day I plugged it into my gaming PC, I didn’t run any productivity apps during my test period. It has a VA panel, not IPS and it made an immediate difference with blacks, they are deeper and it was more punchy in dark scenes. Colors shift a little if you’re not looking at it directly. If you have a single monitor setup and always sit in the same place while playing, then it’s a good deal.
The refresh rate tells a different story. This display supports a rate of 180Hz, which means that after having a 75Hz display, switching to a week of nightly sessions of Call of Duty: Warzone became quite obvious. Smooth tracking, no blurring of images while making quick movements in a fire battle scene. FreeSync technology worked perfectly well to prevent any tears when frames per second became lower than the max supported by this panel in more demanding situations. I also tested it with a PS5 console for two days playing Spider-Man 2 for six hours, and 1080p resolution with a high refresh rate made this game feel much more responsive even for an action one.
It’s not all about good news. It has no base and is only tilted, no swivel or height and, in my testing list it’s the cheapest option. Also there is no height adjustment so if your desk setup requires your monitor to be higher you are propping it up. I also would not want to write too long of an article about this one, it seems to have a slightly dim VA glow around its edges, which aren’t really visible while playing games, but become more visible during extended reading sessions.
| Category | Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|
| Brightness | 6 |
| Color Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Gaming Latency | 9 |
| Stand Quality | 4.5 |
| Ergonomics | 4 |
| HDR | 3 |
| Ports | 5.5 |
| Build Quality | 6 |
| Overall Value | 8 |
Who should skip it: Writers, editors or those who may be reading text for hours every day, the VA glow and barebones are a poor primary work monitor.
Price: Available around $150–$180.
MSI PRO MP275Q took my breath away quietly for its work performance, out of all the stuff on this list. The display is a 27 inch 1440p IPS screen, and I used it for a full week of writing and spreadsheets work. This one is the best for anyone involved in creative work, some light video editing in a timeline app for a week. A lot of the additional horizontal and vertical real estate over a 1080p, really impressed me when I had a script open on one side and a timeline on the other.
Color accuracy is right up there with most of the time when I dropped in some photos I had already color-graded on a calibrated reference monitor and the skin tones and shadow detail were close to what I was used to seeing when I was color grading on the reference monitor, not every monitor can boast that. Not a monitor I would rely on for final color critical delivery work but for cutting rough timelines or general photo work before passing it off to a different monitor for final pass, it is more than capable.
While 60Hz to 100Hz might seem a trivial difference, the 100Hz was definitely not for gaming, but for making your everyday use of the computer feel smoother and that is exactly what it did. I did give it a couple of gaming sessions with Baldur’s Gate 3 and did just fine with slower or more story based ones but if it’s esports you’re after, it’s not it.
My main complaint was the stand has fixed height, it doesn’t move up or down, just tilt. That’s an odd thing in a monitor that’s clearly designed for desk productivity use and I had to use a tiny monitor riser to elevate it to a comfortable eye level.
| Category | Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|
| Brightness | 7.5 |
| Color Accuracy | 8.5 |
| Gaming Latency | 6.5 |
| Stand Quality | 5.5 |
| Ergonomics | 5 |
| HDR | 4 |
| Speakers | 6 |
| Ports | 6 |
| Build Quality | 7.5 |
| Overall Value | 8.5 |
Who should avoid it: if you’re not a gamer wanting a dedicated gaming display, or if you don’t want a stand that doesn’t have the option of height adjustment.
Price: Available around $400–$450.
Samsung ViewFinity S7 was the first monitor that impressed me the moment I turned it on. The transition between 1440p and 4K on the 27 inch panel is really quite remarkable, and the difference in text readability, photo detail and video sharpness are all level one higher compared to the 1440p panel and it’s the closest to a wow factor of all the items on the list to come.
I mainly used it for photo editing and to watch 4K YouTube and Netflix videos and both were worth the upgrade. Netflix’s HDR10 is hottest of the bunch compared to the other tests I did here, and it’s definitely better in terms of highlight detail when bright scenes are in the frame but it’s not quite in the same class as a good high-end HDR display, and it’s still the best budget HDR experience.
The only thing it fails at is refresh rate. It’s a 60Hz panel, which isn’t the type you’d want if you wanted to join 4K resolution with smooth gaming. I played a couple of slower single player games like Horizon Forbidden West on it and it looked great but compared to the higher refresh competitive games it was quite underwhelming.
Another bit of surprising news, and a bad one is this monitor had no USB-C, which is very much the kind of monitor that somebody might want to use as the single-cable laptop display. There’s HDMI, DisplayPort and the standard USB-A/B support, enough to satisfy most desktop applications but not much for this level of laptop productivity that I had in mind.
| Category | Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|
| Brightness | 8 |
| Color Accuracy | 8 |
| Gaming Latency | 5.5 |
| Stand Quality | 7 |
| Ergonomics | 7.5 |
| HDR | 7 |
| Ports | 5.5 |
| Build Quality | 8 |
| Overall Value | 8 |
Who should avoid it: Those who should avoid: People who care more about refresh rate than resolution, and those with a very tight budget who don’t want something more than a no-brainer.
With all five of these side by side for a week or two, there were a couple of things I had learned I would never have known from a spec sheet.
When your spending budget is less than $300, it’s more important than marketing numbers, what kind of panel you have is more important than the big number on the box for refresh rate. A $150 IPS panel will make you happier day to day than a VA panel with a bigger number on the box for refresh rate, for example. JPEGs need a refresh rate if you’re going to use them for that purpose, brightness if you’re going to use them in a bright room, and HDR, well, unless you’re using them in a bright room, it’s hardly a factor at this price.
The Dell S2725DS is the most straightforward recommendation on this list, as it’s sharp, comfortable, well made, and affordable to anyone who needs to work, surf the web, and play a bit for 10 or more hours a day. For those who prioritize gaming over all else, and budget is likely a concern, the Acer Nitro KG241Y stands out as the best option in the market, no other device can compete with it in terms of speed and responsiveness at this price range. The Samsung ViewFinity S7 is the best option for not only the sharpest image for photo work and HDR streaming but there’s a catch: creators and editors will have to sacrifice a little refresh rate for that higher resolution.
Unfortunately, there is no one best monitor on this list. There is only the best one for the job you’re planning on doing with it. Pair the monitor with your lifestyle and not the highest number on the box, and you will be more satisfied with a $150 monitor than the majority of folks are with a $500 monitor.
There are a ton of low-tech gift lists created around items which seem like they are “cool” in the photo but never get used. For…
Be respectful and constructive. Have a question or feedback? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at contact@thetweaks.com