/ Flagship specs, held back by Android.
Kandis Blake is a passionate product review writer. She had six years of testing and reviewing electronics experience before joining TheTweaks. Here At TheTweaks she joined as Review Writer where she tested and reviewed different gadgets. The interesting fact is that she did not rely on the spec sheet, Infact she gives her verdict on the basis of real world testing after spending almost 2 weeks with that product. Kandis is a brilliant writer but in her free time she loves to play badminton as well.
Quick Verdict: The OnePlus Pad 3 After Real-World Use
The OnePlus Pad 3 isn’t held back by its hardware. It’s Android that’s holding it back. That’s the argument of this review. OnePlus developed a truly fast and well crafted tablet: Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, a big 144Hz LCD, an 80W capable 12,140mAh battery, and then gave it to an operating system that still considers large-screen multitasking a luxury.
The difference between the silicon and the software is the entire tale of two weeks with this tablet.
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Display | 13.2″ LTPS LCD, 2400 × 3392px, 144Hz, up to 900 nits HBM, Dolby Vision |
| Chip | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| RAM / Storage Tested | 16GB / 512GB |
| Other Configuration | 12GB / 256GB available in some markets |
| Battery | 12,140mAh, 80W wired charging |
| Body | 289.6 × 209.7 × 6.0mm, 675g, aluminum frame and back |
| Rear Camera | 13MP |
| Front Camera | 8MP |
| Audio | 8 speakers |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS / Cellular | No GPS, no cellular option |
| Software | OxygenOS 15 (Android) |
| Software Support | 3 promised OS upgrades, 6 years of security updates |
| Accessories Tested | OnePlus Smart Keyboard, Stylo 2 stylus |
(Source: OnePlus)
This tablet looks good on paper, as one of the more formidable Android tablets available on the market: a high-end phone processor combined with a big screen all in an affordable package. However, the real question to ask isn’t whether or not OnePlus gave this tablet some impressive specs, the question is whether OxygenOS actually uses them.
I got the OnePlus Pad 3 for two weeks and used it as my usual secondary device and was determined to use it more as a replacement for a laptop than a couch tablet.
This is for writing full articles on it, video calling, running a Slack workspace and Gmail inbox, researching with a handful of browsers opened, gaming for longer periods of time and pairing it with a OnePlus handset to experience the features of the ecosystem.
Two of those fourteen days were dedicated to the cross-device continuity, using a OnePlus phone to see if the ecosystem tools actually affected their day to day experience, we’ll get to that.
Mornings were devoted to email, Slack, and reading. The tablet was perfect for this task, in fact, in many aspects it even surpassed my laptop.
Afternoons were occupied by writing and researching, that’s where the flaws began to appear, when working in more than two or three apps in split-screen mode caused enough hassle that I preferred to close an app rather than re-size it.
Evenings were mostly for media and gaming, two areas where the Pad 3 often felt better suited than my laptop.
Firstly, this one caught my eye on the first evening, when I was trying it out by putting it upright for a downloaded show while having dinner. As it turned out, the display is sharp enough that it stopped being noticeable altogether while watching the show, which may sound like faint praise, yet this is how good displays should be, indeed.
Also, in the next two weeks it proved itself under further examination, when pulling a 40-page contract PDF file, I could read even footnotes without using pinch-to-zoom function, which is something I can’t do with my 11 inch tablet at home.
I performed all my reading sessions on this screen in front of my computer, and text appeared sharp and not blurred when reading it at arm’s length.
As for the size benefits, they were most apparent when opening a PDF file on one half of the screen while working on the notes on the other one, and both sides were equally comfortable to read.
For the purpose of checking outdoor visibility, I brought the tablet with me to the café table in sunny weather, in order to check it in real life conditions instead of assuming it based on the technical information.
Under the umbrella it worked fine even with max brightness settings, however, when placing it in the sunlight I had to angle and block some part of it with my hand in order to read comfortably, which was still easier than using the OLED phone I also had on the table.
I even unintentionally checked this feature myself. After a few days of using the iPad Air M4, I decided to use an older 60 Hz tablet in order to quickly check something, and it seemed to me that scrolling there was noticeably slower.
When going back to my Pad 3 and looking through a lengthy article or playing a fast-paced game, scrolling became almost imperceptible, which usually means that the feature works perfectly.
Launching the app, switching tabs in the browser and navigating were always quick. I didn’t encounter a single instance of the chip being the limiting factor in normal use.
I ran the standard suite on my review unit to see how the numbers held up against the review-unit figure OnePlus quoted at launch.
| Benchmark | My Result |
|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 Single-Core | 3,003 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi-Core | 9,307 |
| Geekbench 6 GPU Compute | 24,691 |
| AnTuTu v11 | 3,612,786 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 2,544 |
| 3DMark Solar Bay | 11,865 |
The first place that the hardware/software gap presents itself is here. It’s clear the chip can run multiple apps concurrently without any slowdown, as Open Canvas’ window management is the issue, not the chip’s performance. More details on this to follow, in the OxygenOS section below.
I ran 30-60 minute sessions for two demanding titles (a graphically intensive open-world game and a competitive shooter) to see how performance held up beyond the first few minutes of play, instead of a quick benchmark run.
I observed that during any activity it didn’t slow down, even in short sessions (less than 15 minutes) of gaming. It’s in particular sustained and demanding load, where the pattern above is present.
OnePlus Pad 3 works with ease, for writing, surfing the web, making calls, and for basic spreadsheet tasks. It has never been the limitation for any productivity task I attempted, only the software’s ability to manage multiple windows.
Gathering all the data from the gaming session, here is the temperature graph I obtained using an infrared thermometer from the back panel location close to the camera module in intervals of five minutes throughout a 30-minute stressful gaming session:
| Time | Surface Temp |
|---|---|
| Baseline (before session) | ~28°C |
| 5 minutes | ~31°C |
| 10 minutes | ~34°C |
| 15 minutes | ~37°C |
| 20 minutes | ~41°C |
| 25 minutes | ~42°C |
| 30 minutes | ~42°C |
The temperature gradually increased over the course of the first 20 minutes and then held steady in the low-40s due to the throttling process as explained in the Gaming Performance section, where the tablet sacrifices clock speed to maintain constant heat generation. In day-to-day productivity work such as writing and web browsing, I have never seen any temperatures beyond the low-30s.
I actually used Chrome, Google Docs, Slack, YouTube, and Files, which I opened and switched between repeatedly during a work session, as a realistic work stack for Open Canvas. It was a success with two apps side by side.
Then add a third or fourth and I found myself having to deal with some weirdness when resizing windows, and apps becoming full screen without prompting, and the amount of irritation I found that I wasn’t getting the full benefit of having more than two windows open at once, so I stopped trying. A serious drawback for those who might want to use this as a true multi-app productivity tool.
The tablet has been marketed by OnePlus on the basis of AI features. During two weeks I was able to use the one I used regularly. AI note summarization for lengthy documents is really helpful for condensing research.
Of the others (image generation tools, some of the AI search overlays) I have tried once, found interesting and then never opened again. Does it endure beyond the initial few days of its launch is a fair indicator of whether it’s a genuine workflow enhancement or a showcase of the launch event.
The single consistent bug was landscape-mode inconsistencies, some apps don’t scale well to a 13.2-inch canvas and don’t render as a proper tablet layout. This is not exclusive to OnePlus, but is a common issue with Android Tablet Software and is very visible on this massive screen.
All of the main Google apps (Docs, Gmail and Chrome) performed well. Some apps were designed for large screens and others weren’t, and it wasn’t consistent.
The weakest part of the package is the Smart Keyboard, which is an example of the type of thing we should be specific about.
Typing speed on a desk was close to my laptop’s, once I adjusted to the shorter key travel. The flex of the keyboard was felt on my lap and hastened the start of typing errors.
The trackpad can be used to navigate and move the cursor, but it isn’t as precise as a laptop trackpad for tasks that require precise control, such as editing photos for fine details or making selections.
Shortcuts were very reliable for copying and pasting, as well as switching between apps. The keyboard has no backlighting, which made typing in darker rooms more difficult than it should be at this price. The charging and connectivity were pogo-pin, and functioned fine over the course of two weeks of everyday use.
The Stylo 2 was the nicer half of the accessory package, with low latency, comfortable grip and reliability for note-taking and marking up.
I can do everything from writing full articles, handling email, to sitting through video calls, on the keyboard setup. I couldn’t work comfortably with heavy files and/or more than two running apps or desktop-only programs.
The OnePlus Pad 3 alone starts at $699.99. With the two accessories that transform it into something that is more like a laptop replacement, the Smart Keyboard and the Stylo 2.
The realistic estimate of a fully equipped setup is in the range of $950-$1,000, based on region and whether OnePlus is offering a bundle promotion (the Stylo 2 and a folio case are both free with some of the early orders, so there is an additional point to check before you factor them in separately).
That is a different value proposition. A $700 tablet is a no-brainer suggestion. At the $950 to $1,000 productivity price point, that’s a price point at which the keyboard’s limitations are less forgivable compared to a really competent laptop and higher-level tablet.
To put it simply: this is not a $700 Laptop Replacement. It’s more like a $1,000 one with real implications at that cost.
The 13.2in 3.4K 144Hz panel is actually a great feature but still LCD, not OLED, which is important for certain use cases but not always.
Where Samsung’s AMOLED panel on the Galaxy Tab S11 is concerned, it performs better in the contrast mode and dark room settings, where blacks look significantly darker when placed side-by-side.
I didn’t miss the contrast of OLED for general productivity, document work or daytime use, and my workflow of side-by-side documents and research tabs was actually more useful with the larger, higher resolution canvas that the Pad 3 provides.
That’s more of a preference based on my workflow. So, others who are color critical photo or video editors may have different preferences for the contrast and color performance that OLED offers, and I’d defer to them for this specific application.
The figures below were taken with the tablet at room temperature before each test, all figures recorded from a full charge and adaptive brightness turned off with the tablet’s brightness set at about 70%, adaptive refresh rate turned on (not locked to 60Hz), and the tablet’s Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity turned on, with the latter connected to the laptop. I used the included OnePlus charger for all charging tests.
As expected, gaming at high brightness with the refresh rate set to Uncapped. For the most part, writing and browsing were the most battery friendly of the productivity activities I tried.
The rear camera is 13MP, but again doesn’t seem to be a camera anyone would judge on its photography capabilities, so it’s not intended to be.
The 8MP front camera is the one that matters to me every day and for the purposes of the test, it was used as a work camera, not as a phone replacement, in Google Meet and Teams calls.
Overall, for the wide view of the front camera in tablets, it was framed well and indoors, the quality was good enough without me being self-conscious on calls. The performance in low-light was significantly degraded with audible noise.
The 8-speaker array is one of the nicer elements of this tablet, certainly more powerful, well-balanced, and better than a lot of tablets in this price range for calls and media.
Combined with the display, the speakers make the Pad 3 an excellent media tablet. This is one area where I rarely found myself making compromises. It’s a powerful tool for viewing videos, no matter how. It is a formidable piece of equipment for viewing video, regardless how.
The unit weighs 675g and measures 6.0mm in thickness, making it a lightweight laptop for its display size, although the 13.2-inch form factor alone means that handling it single-handedly soon becomes tiresome, it’s definitely a two-handed tablet.
On a desk, or on a stand, no complaints. When held in one hand while scrolling, the size was a problem, it wasn’t until I felt the weight of it on my wrist that I realized it was going to be a problem. At rest or in bed, I needed to rest it on something to be held comfortably for extended reading times.
The aluminum frame and back feel high-quality, and the thin 6.0mm profile doesn’t introduce the flex or creaking I’ve experienced on some thinner tablets.
It has no fingerprint sensor, it only unlocks via face (works great in the light, less convenient in the dark or with one hand), no GPS, and the non-backlit keyboard.
This is the practical test rather than the spec comparison. Where exactly was the gap in ecosystem functionality experienced during daily use?
Where the Pad 3 had an edge: the big screen size/quality for the money, the sound system, and the ecosystem functionality, as detailed below, for owners of OnePlus phones.
The Pad 3 is the winner on specs and price vs. hardware. The iPad Air M4 shines on the software’s maturity and the optimization of apps for its form. If you require certain apps that will only run on iPad or will work better on iPad than on a PC, then the Pad 3’s hardware is not in your favor.
The AMOLED panel, combined with the more advanced DeX multitasking layer, gives Samsung tablets a more complete feel like productivity tools, especially for those who are already accustomed to multi-window workflows. The Pad 3 offers a slightly larger, sharper display, and, overall, better raw performance for the price.
This is the real question this review set out to answer.
| Task | Replaced my laptop? |
|---|---|
| Writing | Yes |
| Research (many browser tabs) | Yes |
| Video calls | Yes |
| Light spreadsheet work | Yes |
| Heavy multitasking (3+ apps) | No |
| Desktop-only software | No |
| Complex file management | No |
The Pad 3 successfully replaced my laptop for periods of writing, research, calls and light spreadsheet work. But for anything requiring specialized software, heavy file juggling or more than two apps running at the same time, it didn’t and that’s regardless of the power of the chip inside.
If you’re spending the majority of the day with a laptop, and your work is in the “Yes” column above, the Pad 3 with keyboard is a serious laptop replacement. If you end up using the “No” column a lot, get a laptop, and use the Pad 3 as your second device.
The comparison between 12GB and 16GB RAM cannot be definitive as I have not compared both versions. However, with the 16GB version I have tested, I managed to keep five to ten apps open at once and be able to return to those apps after hours of using the device without having to start the applications from scratch. If your activities are primarily web surfing and writing, then you do not need the 16GB RAM version.
The OnePlus Pad 3 will get three Android OS updates and six years of security patches, according to OnePlus promises. That’s a pretty good deal for a tablet in the $700 range in 2026, but Samsung and Apple both have longer software support periods for similar-range tablets. If you are one of these people who hold onto a device for 5 years or more, this is something to consider as the tablet should have two to three years of life till the next major OS update.
As mentioned before, I took two of my fourteen test days with the OnePlus phone and the Pad 3 to determine if the experience with the OnePlus and the Pad 3 actually changed as you’d think.
Transferring files to and from the phone and tablet was fast and easy, faster even than using a cloud service to do the same. Notification mirroring was successful. It was easy to connect to the hotspot. One of the features I found most helpful across all of the tablets I’ve tested is the phone to tablet transfer of text or images from one device to another.
The O+ Connect feature was less helpful in my configuration compared to the phone to tablet functionality. The phone to tablet sharing functionality worked efficiently compared to the desktop connectivity. The best ecosystem advantages for users of the OnePlus phone would be the phone to tablet functionalities and not the desktop connectivity.
Everything written down here is the experience I had using the device for three months after the first 2-week long test period.
OnePlus Pad 3’s app loading times and the performance in general have remained exactly the same as the day one performance with no noticeable change.
The only thing changed is the amount of free storage space: after installing all necessary apps and media cache after 3 months, the amount of free storage has gone down and I needed to perform the manual cleaning of it in the week eight of using.
There were some software bugs that appeared after using the device for longer than 2 weeks which were not present when using it for 2 weeks:
Those software bugs do not affect the regular use of the device, and those are the usual things that appear during the long-term use that cannot be revealed during the first 2 weeks of use.
After 3 months of use, the device has received two software updates: one that fixed the camera and stability issues (mentioned above), and one that improved Open Canvas experience. None of those updates has performed the reset, and their size and update times were acceptable.
The battery performance has remained the same as in the initial 2-weeks review and screen-on-time has not changed as well. OnePlus does not have the battery health indicator in the settings, so I had to calculate my own estimate based on the previous numbers.
Not really. The balance of good hardware and developing software has been preserved after 3 months of use, and additional software quirks that appeared after extended use have just added another thing to the “software is not there yet” verdict.
Writers, researchers, students, and those who consume media will appreciate serious hardware in a huge-screen Android tablet, and they’re realistic about the current tablet software problems with Android.
But any kind of individual who wants to completely retire a laptop or anyone who requires a Windows-integrated method along with their tablet.
The overall score is not calculated using the pure math approach to average because I give more weight to the factors that make a greater difference to the use of the tablet in everyday life.
| Category | Score |
|---|---|
| Design & Build | 4.5/5 |
| Display | 4.5/5 |
| Performance | 4/5 |
| Software & Multitasking | 3/5 |
| Keyboard & Accessories | 3/5 |
| Battery Life | 4/5 |
| Cameras | 3/5 |
| Speakers | 4.5/5 |
| Value for Money | 3.5/5 |
Hardware is ready for hard work. Software is ready as well, but not yet done. Having used the Pad 3 for writing, researching, calling, gaming, and media for two weeks, the key thing is clear now: the display and Snapdragon 8 Elite are powerful enough, but the Open Canvas, application optimization and keyboard prevent it from becoming a proper laptop alternative.
It is good for writing, researching, calling, simple spreadsheeting and media work, and will be able to take the role of a laptop for extended periods of time. It is still not good for desktop-only software, complex file managing or multi-application workflows.
There are a ton of low-tech gift lists created around items which seem like they are “cool” in the photo but never get used. For…
Be respectful and constructive. Have a question or feedback? We’d love to hear from you. Contact us at contact@thetweaks.com